• Turkey Still Expects An Apology From Israel For Gaza Flotilla Raid
  • Israeli FM offers plan to back Armenians for punishing Turkey
  • Israel Must Remind Turkey of Monstrous Deeds against Armenians, Says Israeli Politician
  • " />

    Home » Armenia »Europe »Top News »Turkey »Video » Currently Reading:

    The dangers of an Israeli apology to Turkey

    August 3, 2011 Armenia, Europe, Top News, Turkey, Video 2 Comments
    Image g_image.php

    Recently, there have been renewed rumors of a possible deal to help heal the rift that developed between Israel and Turkey following the deaths of eight Turkish citizens on the ship Mavi Marmara as it sailed toward Gaza in May 2010.

    The broad outlines of the deal suggest that Israel would offer a limited apology for “operational errors,” and would pay compensation to the families of those who died. In return, Turkey would recognize the legality of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza, and would agree not to seek legal action against Israeli soldiers who were involved.

    The Mavi Marmara set sail from Turkey as part of a flotilla whose primary aim was to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza. Israel had imposed the blockade to prevent the importation of weapons and dual-use material that ultimately could be used by the Hamas government against Israeli civilians.

    The Israeli Navy interdicted the flotilla and boarded the ships after they refused to turn back. As is clear from the video of the events that followed, the navy commandos – who were armed only with paintball guns and side-arms – were attacked as they boarded the Mavi Marmara by a group of passengers wielding iron bars, knives, and possibly guns. Several commandos were wounded in the ensuing battle, and nine members of the Turkish group IHH – which claims to be a humanitarian organization but has long supported radical Islamic groups, including Hamas – were killed. The boarding of all other ships was peaceful. It appears that the confrontation had been prepared for, and instigated by, the members of the IHH.

    The UN then established a commission headed by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, and that included representatives of both Israel and Turkey, to investigate what happened. The Palmer Commission’s report was scheduled to be issued during the last week in July, but has been delayed until late August as the two countries seek to reach a compromise agreement.
    The problem with the proposed deal between Israel and Turkey is that an Israeli apology could very well exacerbate the rift between the two countries, at the same time causing a worldwide public relations nightmare for Israel.

    While the apology would refer specifically to “operational errors,” the world will not recognize such diplomatic nuances. Instead, Israel will be seen as accepting full responsibility for the deaths of the IHH “activists.” The media and UN will be flooded with self-righteous statements of “I told you so,” along with renewed allegations of a “brutal response” by Israeli commandos to “peaceful resistance.”
    An apology will also have far reaching negative ramifications for the Jewish state. It will appear to contradict Israel’s repeated assertion that its actions were a necessary response to unprovoked attacks by mercenaries bent on “martyrdom.” Israel will find it much more difficult to explain any military action as necessary and justifiable self-defense. From then on, the world will see such claims as self-serving and ultimately unreliable.

    Just as problematic, the Israeli government would be abandoning thousands of supporters who relied on Israel’s veracity and defended its actions in the face of withering external criticism. These supporters will be left swinging in the air – much like the Navy commandos who fast-roped from helicopters into the waiting clubs of the armed IHH mercenaries.

    For years, Israel has criticized the PA and Hamas for providing financial benefits to terrorists’ families. Such payments honor murderers and serve as incentives for others to follow in their footsteps. Just this past week, for example, it was revealed that the PA pays more than $5 million per month, funded by the United States and Europe, in “salaries” to all Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs currently imprisoned in Israel for crimes of terror; How will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distinguish the Palestinian payments to terrorists from the “compensation” he is considering paying to the families of those who died on the ship? These payments could be seen as whitewash the IHH actions and benefit the families of would-be murderers.

    Finally, an Israeli apology, no matter how limited, will call into question Israel’s fundamental claim that the Gaza blockade is necessary. Many more flotillas will then be planned, and “open season” on IDF personnel who try to stop them.

    What would Israel receive in return for an apology? Turkey’s acceptance of the blockade’s legality would be at best a hollow victory. Most of the world will not even be aware of this concession. No responsible legal authority questions Israel’s right to impose a blockade on its hostile neighbor. The Palmer Commission’s draft report indicates that neither an apology nor compensation is required from Israel for its legal actions.

    Although Turkey may keep its promise not to pursue state legal action against Israeli commandos, there is no guarantee that it will prevent private Turkish citizens or organizations from filing their own law suits.

    The most recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggest how little he is really interested in returning to the previous warm relations between the countries. He has demanded nothing short of a full lifting of the blockade, and, threatened that Turkey will become a full-fledged opponent unless Israel complies with its demand for an apology, and has even demanded an apology from the Armenians for having been slaughtered by the Turks early in the last century. Rather than trying to resolve the countries’ differences, Erdogan seems bent on exacerbating them.

    Offering a limited apology for deadly events that were precipitated by Turkish IHH passengers will provide, at best, only short-term benefits for the Israel/Turkey relationship if at all. At the same time, it could do grievous long-term harm to Israel, its supporters, and the Israel Defense For

    By Efraim Cohen
    Hudson New York

     

    Source: TertOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. Turkey Still Expects An Apology From Israel For Gaza Flotilla Raid
    2. Israeli FM offers plan to back Armenians for punishing Turkey
    3. Israel Must Remind Turkey of Monstrous Deeds against Armenians, Says Israeli Politician
    4. Turkey Closes Airspace To Some Israeli Flights
    5. Turkey is Offended, Israeli Consul

    Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

    1. Berge Jololian says:

      The dangers of an Israeli apology. When will Israel do the right thing?

      Turkey and Israel deserve each other. For two decades, the Israel Lobby in the US was feeding the wolf and feeding the wolf… well, … now the wolf has grown and is coming back to eat them.

      Rabbi Hillel said it best, “If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, then what am I? And if not now, when?”

      When will the Hebrew State of Israel do the right thing and acknowledge Turkey’s crimes against humanity and the Armenian Genocide?

      The inscriptions from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC (“Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” – Adolf Hitler)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hitler_Armenian_Quote.JPG

      When will the Israel Lobby (AJC, JINSA, ADL and AIPAC) stop supporting Turkey’s denial of its crime of Genocide of 1.5 million Armenians and stop blocking the US Congress from passing a resolution to acknowledge it?

      The world doesn’t take seriously what American Jewish leaders have to say about the 6 million Jews killed during World War II, not when it sees the same Jewish leaders lobby the US Congress against acknowledging the Armenian genocide and quiet everyone over the murders of 1.5 million other innocents.

      Raphael Lemkin, a lawyer of Polish-Jewish descent, created the word “genocide” specifically to describe what had happened to the Armenians. Dr. Lemkin explained that the Turks committed genocide with the intent to annihilate.

      When will Israel acknowledge the Armenian Genocide?

    2. Berge Jololian says:

      Turkey and Israel deserve each other. For two decades, the Israel lobby in the US was feeding the wolf…now the wolf has grown and is coming back to eat them.

      Rabbi Hillel said it best, “If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, then what am I? And if not now, when?”

      When will the Hebrew state of Israel do the right thing and acknowledge Turkey’s crimes against humanity and for committing the Genocide of Armenians?

      The inscriptions from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington reads, “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” – Adolf Hitler (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hitler_Armenian_Quote.JPG)

      When will the Israel lobby (AJC, JINSA, ADL and AIPAC) stop supporting Turkey’s denial of its slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians and stop blocking the US Congress from passing a resolution to acknowledge it?

      The world doesn’t take seriously what American Jewish leaders have to say about the 6 million Jews killed during World War II, not when it sees the same Jewish leaders lobby the US Congress against acknowledging the Genocide of Armenians and quite everyone over the murders of 1.5 million other innocents.

      Raphael Lemkin, a lawyer of Polish-Jewish descent, coined the word “genocide” specifically to describe the barbarity that befell the Armenians at the hands of the Turkish State. Dr. Lemkin explained that the Turks committed genocide with the intent to annihilate. Lemkin said “I became interested in genocide because it happened so many times, first to the Armenians, then after the Armenians, Hitler took action…”

      When will Israel acknowledge the Genocide of Armenians?

    Comment on this Article:







    Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    RSS International News By CNN

    CNN International Explores the Secrets of Armenia’s Stone Henge

    AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

    Recent Comments

    RSS Middle East News By BBC

    RSS Sports News By The Huffington Post

    • For The Love Of God, People, Do Not Dress Up As Ray Rice For Halloween
      Most Halloween costumes are funny or clever. This is not an example of one of them. A Reddit user who asked to remain anonymous posted the following image on Sunday night, explaining that his "friend came to the party as Ray Rice." It shows a man with the running back's jersey dragging a blow up doll on the floor. In September, elevator footag […]
    • Skip Bayless Claims Kobe Bryant's Sexual Assault Case Helped Him Sell Sneakers
      ESPN's Skip Bayless put on his imaginary marketing-expert cap to make an outrageous claim about Kobe Bryant during "First Take" on Monday. Bayless and fellow co-host Stephen A. Smith had been discussing the unlikely endorsement deal recently landed by Dallas Cowboys running back Joseph Randle before Bryant was mentioned. Randle inked an underw […]
    • Michael Rapaport: Bill Simmons Is Still 'Pro-ESPN' After His Suspension
      Bill Simmons quietly returned to work at Grantland last week after serving a three-week suspension, the result of a rant against NFL commissioner Roger Goodell in which the ESPN golden child challenged his bosses to do something about his comments. They did, and Simmons went quiet for those three weeks, mostly playing golf during his time off. Filmmaker and […]
    • Game-Changing Plays from Week 7 in the NFL
      To highlight the Live ScoreCaster, we will take our in-game technology, Live ScoreCaster, to the next level to review the game-changing plays from the NFL and what the game would have looked like if the plays had turned out differently. Click the header for each game to view the Game Breakdown for each matchup. Seahawks vs. Rams St. Louis used a fake punt to […]
    • Jumpy The Dog Pretends To Drink Gatorade, Adorably Quenches Pretend Thirst
      Derek Jeter, one of Gatorade's most enduring endorsers, is no longer playing Major League Baseball -- so maybe there's an opening for Jumpy the dog. Watch Jumpy go full thespian to fake-drink a capped bottle of Gatorade. Way to guzzle those pretend electrolytes, Jumpy! Here are a few other tricks Jumpy's been polishing lately. H/T Laughing Squ […]
    • Tailored Football Fans
      Tim (not Marlon) Brando speaks beautifully All of my football friends were out of town this weekend, and I can't stand to watch a game alone, so I decided to invite my tailors -- Wang, Patel and Rabinowitz -- over to watch some NFL action on Sunday. Also present was my niece, Natalie, who has no job or discernible talents, but is without a doubt the mos […]
    • Ohio State University Marching Band Halftime Show Rocks The Stadium Like A Hurricane
      This collegiate marching band takes rocking the crowd to a whole new level. During the halftime show of Ohio State's Oct. 18 game against Rutgers, The Ohio State University Marching Band didn't just play a classic rock medley -- its members expertly formed rock tribute symbols, including images of people jamming on musical instruments. Like so: The […]
    • More Than 100,000 High School, College Athletes Are Homeless: Report
      Though college recruiters repeatedly tried contacting Bobby Limon, the burly lineman had no idea any universities were interested in him. The homeless Texas teen had moved around so many times that there was no fixed address where he could be reached. Limon represents more than 100,000 U.S. athletes on youth, high school and college teams who have secured co […]
    • Every Single NFL Player Who Has Caught A Touchdown Pass From Peyton Manning
      With a four-touchdown performance against the San Francisco 49ers on Sunday night, Peyton Manning has now thrown the most career touchdown passes -- 510 -- in NFL history. Throughout his long and illustrious career, several teammates have actually caught those touchdown passes. In fact, Manning has thrown a touchdown pass to 45 different players, with their […]
    • This Is What It's Like To Run A Marathon In Dangerous Smog Levels
      Thousand of runners gathered in Beijing this weekend for the 34th edition of the city's international marathon. On their way from Tiananmen Square to the Bird's Nest stadium, athletes faced more than 26 miles of route, massive crowds and ... epic smog. The South China Morning Post reported that as the nearly 30,000 participants lined up at the star […]

    Poll

    Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.

    -

    Featured Books

    Book Reviews

    John Balian’s “Novel Approach” Brings the Armenian Saga to the Masses – An interview with John Balian by Lucine Kasbarian

    Gray Wolves and White Doves cover art

    Recently, there have been renewed rumors of a possible deal to help heal the rift that developed between Israel and Turkey following the deaths of eight Turkish citizens on the ship Mavi Marmara as it sailed toward Gaza in May 2010.

    The broad outlines of the deal suggest that Israel would offer a limited apology for “operational errors,” and would pay compensation to the families of those who died. In return, Turkey would recognize the legality of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza, and would agree not to seek legal action against Israeli soldiers who were involved.

    The Mavi Marmara set sail from Turkey as part of a flotilla whose primary aim was to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza. Israel had imposed the blockade to prevent the importation of weapons and dual-use material that ultimately could be used by the Hamas government against Israeli civilians.

    The Israeli Navy interdicted the flotilla and boarded the ships after they refused to turn back. As is clear from the video of the events that followed, the navy commandos – who were armed only with paintball guns and side-arms – were attacked as they boarded the Mavi Marmara by a group of passengers wielding iron bars, knives, and possibly guns. Several commandos were wounded in the ensuing battle, and nine members of the Turkish group IHH – which claims to be a humanitarian organization but has long supported radical Islamic groups, including Hamas – were killed. The boarding of all other ships was peaceful. It appears that the confrontation had been prepared for, and instigated by, the members of the IHH.

    The UN then established a commission headed by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, and that included representatives of both Israel and Turkey, to investigate what happened. The Palmer Commission’s report was scheduled to be issued during the last week in July, but has been delayed until late August as the two countries seek to reach a compromise agreement.
    The problem with the proposed deal between Israel and Turkey is that an Israeli apology could very well exacerbate the rift between the two countries, at the same time causing a worldwide public relations nightmare for Israel.

    While the apology would refer specifically to “operational errors,” the world will not recognize such diplomatic nuances. Instead, Israel will be seen as accepting full responsibility for the deaths of the IHH “activists.” The media and UN will be flooded with self-righteous statements of “I told you so,” along with renewed allegations of a “brutal response” by Israeli commandos to “peaceful resistance.”
    An apology will also have far reaching negative ramifications for the Jewish state. It will appear to contradict Israel’s repeated assertion that its actions were a necessary response to unprovoked attacks by mercenaries bent on “martyrdom.” Israel will find it much more difficult to explain any military action as necessary and justifiable self-defense. From then on, the world will see such claims as self-serving and ultimately unreliable.

    Just as problematic, the Israeli government would be abandoning thousands of supporters who relied on Israel’s veracity and defended its actions in the face of withering external criticism. These supporters will be left swinging in the air – much like the Navy commandos who fast-roped from helicopters into the waiting clubs of the armed IHH mercenaries.

    For years, Israel has criticized the PA and Hamas for providing financial benefits to terrorists’ families. Such payments honor murderers and serve as incentives for others to follow in their footsteps. Just this past week, for example, it was revealed that the PA pays more than $5 million per month, funded by the United States and Europe, in “salaries” to all Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs currently imprisoned in Israel for crimes of terror; How will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distinguish the Palestinian payments to terrorists from the “compensation” he is considering paying to the families of those who died on the ship? These payments could be seen as whitewash the IHH actions and benefit the families of would-be murderers.

    Finally, an Israeli apology, no matter how limited, will call into question Israel’s fundamental claim that the Gaza blockade is necessary. Many more flotillas will then be planned, and “open season” on IDF personnel who try to stop them.

    What would Israel receive in return for an apology? Turkey’s acceptance of the blockade’s legality would be at best a hollow victory. Most of the world will not even be aware of this concession. No responsible legal authority questions Israel’s right to impose a blockade on its hostile neighbor. The Palmer Commission’s draft report indicates that neither an apology nor compensation is required from Israel for its legal actions.

    Although Turkey may keep its promise not to pursue state legal action against Israeli commandos, there is no guarantee that it will prevent private Turkish citizens or organizations from filing their own law suits.

    The most recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggest how little he is really interested in returning to the previous warm relations between the countries. He has demanded nothing short of a full lifting of the blockade, and, threatened that Turkey will become a full-fledged opponent unless Israel complies with its demand for an apology, and has even demanded an apology from the Armenians for having been slaughtered by the Turks early in the last century. Rather than trying to resolve the countries’ differences, Erdogan seems bent on exacerbating them.

    Offering a limited apology for deadly events that were precipitated by Turkish IHH passengers will provide, at best, only short-term benefits for the Israel/Turkey relationship if at all. At the same time, it could do grievous long-term harm to Israel, its supporters, and the Israel Defense For

    By Efraim Cohen
    Hudson New York

     

    Source: TertOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. Turkey Still Expects An Apology From Israel For Gaza Flotilla Raid
    2. Israeli FM offers plan to back Armenians for punishing Turkey
    3. Israel Must Remind Turkey of Monstrous Deeds against Armenians, Says Israeli Politician
    4. Turkey Closes Airspace To Some Israeli Flights
    5. Turkey is Offended, Israeli Consul

    New Children’s Picture Book From Armenian Folklore

    Recently, there have been renewed rumors of a possible deal to help heal the rift that developed between Israel and Turkey following the deaths of eight Turkish citizens on the ship Mavi Marmara as it sailed toward Gaza in May 2010.

    The broad outlines of the deal suggest that Israel would offer a limited apology for “operational errors,” and would pay compensation to the families of those who died. In return, Turkey would recognize the legality of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza, and would agree not to seek legal action against Israeli soldiers who were involved.

    The Mavi Marmara set sail from Turkey as part of a flotilla whose primary aim was to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza. Israel had imposed the blockade to prevent the importation of weapons and dual-use material that ultimately could be used by the Hamas government against Israeli civilians.

    The Israeli Navy interdicted the flotilla and boarded the ships after they refused to turn back. As is clear from the video of the events that followed, the navy commandos – who were armed only with paintball guns and side-arms – were attacked as they boarded the Mavi Marmara by a group of passengers wielding iron bars, knives, and possibly guns. Several commandos were wounded in the ensuing battle, and nine members of the Turkish group IHH – which claims to be a humanitarian organization but has long supported radical Islamic groups, including Hamas – were killed. The boarding of all other ships was peaceful. It appears that the confrontation had been prepared for, and instigated by, the members of the IHH.

    The UN then established a commission headed by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, and that included representatives of both Israel and Turkey, to investigate what happened. The Palmer Commission’s report was scheduled to be issued during the last week in July, but has been delayed until late August as the two countries seek to reach a compromise agreement.
    The problem with the proposed deal between Israel and Turkey is that an Israeli apology could very well exacerbate the rift between the two countries, at the same time causing a worldwide public relations nightmare for Israel.

    While the apology would refer specifically to “operational errors,” the world will not recognize such diplomatic nuances. Instead, Israel will be seen as accepting full responsibility for the deaths of the IHH “activists.” The media and UN will be flooded with self-righteous statements of “I told you so,” along with renewed allegations of a “brutal response” by Israeli commandos to “peaceful resistance.”
    An apology will also have far reaching negative ramifications for the Jewish state. It will appear to contradict Israel’s repeated assertion that its actions were a necessary response to unprovoked attacks by mercenaries bent on “martyrdom.” Israel will find it much more difficult to explain any military action as necessary and justifiable self-defense. From then on, the world will see such claims as self-serving and ultimately unreliable.

    Just as problematic, the Israeli government would be abandoning thousands of supporters who relied on Israel’s veracity and defended its actions in the face of withering external criticism. These supporters will be left swinging in the air – much like the Navy commandos who fast-roped from helicopters into the waiting clubs of the armed IHH mercenaries.

    For years, Israel has criticized the PA and Hamas for providing financial benefits to terrorists’ families. Such payments honor murderers and serve as incentives for others to follow in their footsteps. Just this past week, for example, it was revealed that the PA pays more than $5 million per month, funded by the United States and Europe, in “salaries” to all Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs currently imprisoned in Israel for crimes of terror; How will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distinguish the Palestinian payments to terrorists from the “compensation” he is considering paying to the families of those who died on the ship? These payments could be seen as whitewash the IHH actions and benefit the families of would-be murderers.

    Finally, an Israeli apology, no matter how limited, will call into question Israel’s fundamental claim that the Gaza blockade is necessary. Many more flotillas will then be planned, and “open season” on IDF personnel who try to stop them.

    What would Israel receive in return for an apology? Turkey’s acceptance of the blockade’s legality would be at best a hollow victory. Most of the world will not even be aware of this concession. No responsible legal authority questions Israel’s right to impose a blockade on its hostile neighbor. The Palmer Commission’s draft report indicates that neither an apology nor compensation is required from Israel for its legal actions.

    Although Turkey may keep its promise not to pursue state legal action against Israeli commandos, there is no guarantee that it will prevent private Turkish citizens or organizations from filing their own law suits.

    The most recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggest how little he is really interested in returning to the previous warm relations between the countries. He has demanded nothing short of a full lifting of the blockade, and, threatened that Turkey will become a full-fledged opponent unless Israel complies with its demand for an apology, and has even demanded an apology from the Armenians for having been slaughtered by the Turks early in the last century. Rather than trying to resolve the countries’ differences, Erdogan seems bent on exacerbating them.

    Offering a limited apology for deadly events that were precipitated by Turkish IHH passengers will provide, at best, only short-term benefits for the Israel/Turkey relationship if at all. At the same time, it could do grievous long-term harm to Israel, its supporters, and the Israel Defense For

    By Efraim Cohen
    Hudson New York

     

    Source: TertOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. Turkey Still Expects An Apology From Israel For Gaza Flotilla Raid
    2. Israeli FM offers plan to back Armenians for punishing Turkey
    3. Israel Must Remind Turkey of Monstrous Deeds against Armenians, Says Israeli Politician
    4. Turkey Closes Airspace To Some Israeli Flights
    5. Turkey is Offended, Israeli Consul

    “We Need To Lift The Armenian Taboo”

    Recently, there have been renewed rumors of a possible deal to help heal the rift that developed between Israel and Turkey following the deaths of eight Turkish citizens on the ship Mavi Marmara as it sailed toward Gaza in May 2010.

    The broad outlines of the deal suggest that Israel would offer a limited apology for “operational errors,” and would pay compensation to the families of those who died. In return, Turkey would recognize the legality of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza, and would agree not to seek legal action against Israeli soldiers who were involved.

    The Mavi Marmara set sail from Turkey as part of a flotilla whose primary aim was to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza. Israel had imposed the blockade to prevent the importation of weapons and dual-use material that ultimately could be used by the Hamas government against Israeli civilians.

    The Israeli Navy interdicted the flotilla and boarded the ships after they refused to turn back. As is clear from the video of the events that followed, the navy commandos – who were armed only with paintball guns and side-arms – were attacked as they boarded the Mavi Marmara by a group of passengers wielding iron bars, knives, and possibly guns. Several commandos were wounded in the ensuing battle, and nine members of the Turkish group IHH – which claims to be a humanitarian organization but has long supported radical Islamic groups, including Hamas – were killed. The boarding of all other ships was peaceful. It appears that the confrontation had been prepared for, and instigated by, the members of the IHH.

    The UN then established a commission headed by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, and that included representatives of both Israel and Turkey, to investigate what happened. The Palmer Commission’s report was scheduled to be issued during the last week in July, but has been delayed until late August as the two countries seek to reach a compromise agreement.
    The problem with the proposed deal between Israel and Turkey is that an Israeli apology could very well exacerbate the rift between the two countries, at the same time causing a worldwide public relations nightmare for Israel.

    While the apology would refer specifically to “operational errors,” the world will not recognize such diplomatic nuances. Instead, Israel will be seen as accepting full responsibility for the deaths of the IHH “activists.” The media and UN will be flooded with self-righteous statements of “I told you so,” along with renewed allegations of a “brutal response” by Israeli commandos to “peaceful resistance.”
    An apology will also have far reaching negative ramifications for the Jewish state. It will appear to contradict Israel’s repeated assertion that its actions were a necessary response to unprovoked attacks by mercenaries bent on “martyrdom.” Israel will find it much more difficult to explain any military action as necessary and justifiable self-defense. From then on, the world will see such claims as self-serving and ultimately unreliable.

    Just as problematic, the Israeli government would be abandoning thousands of supporters who relied on Israel’s veracity and defended its actions in the face of withering external criticism. These supporters will be left swinging in the air – much like the Navy commandos who fast-roped from helicopters into the waiting clubs of the armed IHH mercenaries.

    For years, Israel has criticized the PA and Hamas for providing financial benefits to terrorists’ families. Such payments honor murderers and serve as incentives for others to follow in their footsteps. Just this past week, for example, it was revealed that the PA pays more than $5 million per month, funded by the United States and Europe, in “salaries” to all Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs currently imprisoned in Israel for crimes of terror; How will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distinguish the Palestinian payments to terrorists from the “compensation” he is considering paying to the families of those who died on the ship? These payments could be seen as whitewash the IHH actions and benefit the families of would-be murderers.

    Finally, an Israeli apology, no matter how limited, will call into question Israel’s fundamental claim that the Gaza blockade is necessary. Many more flotillas will then be planned, and “open season” on IDF personnel who try to stop them.

    What would Israel receive in return for an apology? Turkey’s acceptance of the blockade’s legality would be at best a hollow victory. Most of the world will not even be aware of this concession. No responsible legal authority questions Israel’s right to impose a blockade on its hostile neighbor. The Palmer Commission’s draft report indicates that neither an apology nor compensation is required from Israel for its legal actions.

    Although Turkey may keep its promise not to pursue state legal action against Israeli commandos, there is no guarantee that it will prevent private Turkish citizens or organizations from filing their own law suits.

    The most recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggest how little he is really interested in returning to the previous warm relations between the countries. He has demanded nothing short of a full lifting of the blockade, and, threatened that Turkey will become a full-fledged opponent unless Israel complies with its demand for an apology, and has even demanded an apology from the Armenians for having been slaughtered by the Turks early in the last century. Rather than trying to resolve the countries’ differences, Erdogan seems bent on exacerbating them.

    Offering a limited apology for deadly events that were precipitated by Turkish IHH passengers will provide, at best, only short-term benefits for the Israel/Turkey relationship if at all. At the same time, it could do grievous long-term harm to Israel, its supporters, and the Israel Defense For

    By Efraim Cohen
    Hudson New York

     

    Source: TertOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. Turkey Still Expects An Apology From Israel For Gaza Flotilla Raid
    2. Israeli FM offers plan to back Armenians for punishing Turkey
    3. Israel Must Remind Turkey of Monstrous Deeds against Armenians, Says Israeli Politician
    4. Turkey Closes Airspace To Some Israeli Flights
    5. Turkey is Offended, Israeli Consul

    US Media Discusses The Armenian Genocide

    Recently, there have been renewed rumors of a possible deal to help heal the rift that developed between Israel and Turkey following the deaths of eight Turkish citizens on the ship Mavi Marmara as it sailed toward Gaza in May 2010.

    The broad outlines of the deal suggest that Israel would offer a limited apology for “operational errors,” and would pay compensation to the families of those who died. In return, Turkey would recognize the legality of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza, and would agree not to seek legal action against Israeli soldiers who were involved.

    The Mavi Marmara set sail from Turkey as part of a flotilla whose primary aim was to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza. Israel had imposed the blockade to prevent the importation of weapons and dual-use material that ultimately could be used by the Hamas government against Israeli civilians.

    The Israeli Navy interdicted the flotilla and boarded the ships after they refused to turn back. As is clear from the video of the events that followed, the navy commandos – who were armed only with paintball guns and side-arms – were attacked as they boarded the Mavi Marmara by a group of passengers wielding iron bars, knives, and possibly guns. Several commandos were wounded in the ensuing battle, and nine members of the Turkish group IHH – which claims to be a humanitarian organization but has long supported radical Islamic groups, including Hamas – were killed. The boarding of all other ships was peaceful. It appears that the confrontation had been prepared for, and instigated by, the members of the IHH.

    The UN then established a commission headed by former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, and that included representatives of both Israel and Turkey, to investigate what happened. The Palmer Commission’s report was scheduled to be issued during the last week in July, but has been delayed until late August as the two countries seek to reach a compromise agreement.
    The problem with the proposed deal between Israel and Turkey is that an Israeli apology could very well exacerbate the rift between the two countries, at the same time causing a worldwide public relations nightmare for Israel.

    While the apology would refer specifically to “operational errors,” the world will not recognize such diplomatic nuances. Instead, Israel will be seen as accepting full responsibility for the deaths of the IHH “activists.” The media and UN will be flooded with self-righteous statements of “I told you so,” along with renewed allegations of a “brutal response” by Israeli commandos to “peaceful resistance.”
    An apology will also have far reaching negative ramifications for the Jewish state. It will appear to contradict Israel’s repeated assertion that its actions were a necessary response to unprovoked attacks by mercenaries bent on “martyrdom.” Israel will find it much more difficult to explain any military action as necessary and justifiable self-defense. From then on, the world will see such claims as self-serving and ultimately unreliable.

    Just as problematic, the Israeli government would be abandoning thousands of supporters who relied on Israel’s veracity and defended its actions in the face of withering external criticism. These supporters will be left swinging in the air – much like the Navy commandos who fast-roped from helicopters into the waiting clubs of the armed IHH mercenaries.

    For years, Israel has criticized the PA and Hamas for providing financial benefits to terrorists’ families. Such payments honor murderers and serve as incentives for others to follow in their footsteps. Just this past week, for example, it was revealed that the PA pays more than $5 million per month, funded by the United States and Europe, in “salaries” to all Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs currently imprisoned in Israel for crimes of terror; How will Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distinguish the Palestinian payments to terrorists from the “compensation” he is considering paying to the families of those who died on the ship? These payments could be seen as whitewash the IHH actions and benefit the families of would-be murderers.

    Finally, an Israeli apology, no matter how limited, will call into question Israel’s fundamental claim that the Gaza blockade is necessary. Many more flotillas will then be planned, and “open season” on IDF personnel who try to stop them.

    What would Israel receive in return for an apology? Turkey’s acceptance of the blockade’s legality would be at best a hollow victory. Most of the world will not even be aware of this concession. No responsible legal authority questions Israel’s right to impose a blockade on its hostile neighbor. The Palmer Commission’s draft report indicates that neither an apology nor compensation is required from Israel for its legal actions.

    Although Turkey may keep its promise not to pursue state legal action against Israeli commandos, there is no guarantee that it will prevent private Turkish citizens or organizations from filing their own law suits.

    The most recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggest how little he is really interested in returning to the previous warm relations between the countries. He has demanded nothing short of a full lifting of the blockade, and, threatened that Turkey will become a full-fledged opponent unless Israel complies with its demand for an apology, and has even demanded an apology from the Armenians for having been slaughtered by the Turks early in the last century. Rather than trying to resolve the countries’ differences, Erdogan seems bent on exacerbating them.

    Offering a limited apology for deadly events that were precipitated by Turkish IHH passengers will provide, at best, only short-term benefits for the Israel/Turkey relationship if at all. At the same time, it could do grievous long-term harm to Israel, its supporters, and the Israel Defense For

    By Efraim Cohen
    Hudson New York

     

    Source: TertOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. Turkey Still Expects An Apology From Israel For Gaza Flotilla Raid
    2. Israeli FM offers plan to back Armenians for punishing Turkey
    3. Israel Must Remind Turkey of Monstrous Deeds against Armenians, Says Israeli Politician
    4. Turkey Closes Airspace To Some Israeli Flights
    5. Turkey is Offended, Israeli Consul

    Our Sponsors

    Commentary

    Yerevan Calling: A Weekly Roundup of Random Musings from Armenia

    Image 56686.jpg

    13:05, October 3, 2014

    Here it is dear readers, the debut of a weekly column I hope to maintain on a regular basis.

    It’s sort of a catch-all of news snippets, irreverent commentary, and personal observations on what’s happened during the week here in Yerevan, and throughout Armenia.. Hopefully, you’ll find it interesting, if not slightly diverting.

    Your comments and suggestions are welcomed.

    Regards – Hrant

    Oct. 2 – Protests Throughout Armenia: A Game of Numbers & Solidarity

    Three separate protest rallies took place in Armenia today.

    As Hetq reported earlier, business owners in the town of Sevan kept their stores and factories shut to protest changes to the so-called volume (sales) tax. Local residents flocked to the bread factory to wait on line for a loaf or two.

    Merchants and small retailers again gathered outside the government building in Yerevan to voice their opposition to the changes in the volume tax law that requires that they keep receipts for all inventory purchases and sales.

    In Yerevan, vehicle owners who have bandied together in a group calling itself “Keep Away from Our Pockets” tried to drive through the city in a convoy of cars to protest paid parking spaces many argue is just a ruse for some oligarchs to make money. Police stopped them before getting too far.The bulk of the fines and fees don’t even go to the Yerevan city coffers but is kept as income by the corporation overseeing the parking spots. The drivers are also complaining about traffic fines they say are too exorbitant.

    Taking you grievances to the street is a growing trend in Armenia – whether in towns or villages.

    The largest and most successful to date were the sustained protests that took place in the summer of 2013 in Yerevan that eventually forced the municipal government to rescind public transportation fare hikes.

    But ever since then, demos and protests seem to have lost their verve and vigor and are more and more issue specific. While this is to be expected (those immediately affected by this or that government decision are the first on the streets), the general citizenry once again seem resigned to whatever fate awaits them.

    While attempts were made to broaden the participation of these mini-protests and to link their specific interests under some kind of umbrella movement, they proved unsuccessful.

    Numbers and mutual solidarity remain elusive. Strategizing and innovative tactics are also lacking.

    Three opposition political parties are gearing up for a joint rally on Oct. 10.  Let’s see if it will be more of the same old, same old…

    Oct. 1 – Government Reappoints Thug as Syunik Governor

    Hetq readers will know that SourikKhachatryan, the publicly disgraced and much maligned former Syunik Provincial Governor, was reinstated to his old job this week. Khachatryan was forced to temporarily step down after being implicated in a June shoot-out near his Goris home in which an Artsakh Army commander was seriously wounded and his brother killed.

    Here’s a tit for tat exchange between HAK (Armenian National Congress) MP NikolPashinyan and Armenian Prime Minister HovikAbrahamyan in parliament regarding Khachatryan’s reinstatement.

    Pashinyan (and I paraphrase here) – That man has been charged with expropriation of public property through fraud, auto theft, the beating of several individuals, one incident when he hit a prominent woman in a Yerevan hotel was caught on tape, the beating of a child because he had a quarrel with the father…Recently, this individual murdered a man by shooting him from such a position from his house that the cameras didn’t catch him…”

    Abrahamyan – Who is this man you refer to? Oh, SourikKhachatryan. Well, I nominated him for reinstatement based on his years of experience in provincial governance and organizational skills.

    The prime minister added: “I’ve also taken into account the wishes of the people of Syunik. Our studies show that a majority want him as their provincial governor.”

    Oct. 1 – Diaspora Minister Receives “Good Job” Watch

    Armenian Prime Minister HovikAbrahamyan visited Diaspora Minister HranoushHakobyan at her office bearing gifts. Well, one gift in particular. The PM bestowed Hakobyan with a commemorative “prime ministerial” watch for a job well done.

    Now c’mon folks.A stinking watch? A grandfather’s clock would have been more appropriate.

    Oct. 1 – Armenia is Getting “Old”

    This is the view of GarikHayrapetyan, who heads the Yerevan Office of the UN Population Fund.

    On Wednesday, which marked the International Day of the Elderly (we’ll all get there sometime), Hayrapetyan told journalists in Yerevan that 13% of Armenia’s population is over the age of 60. (That’s practically bordering on senility).

    Anyway, he claimed that the country is fast approaching what is termed the ranks of “old countries” (you know, where the president or dictator walks around on crutches).

    Right now, thank god, Armenia is merely considered “growing old”.

    Khachatryan attributes the age imbalance to the fall in the birthrate after independence.

    Less young people means less people to take care of the elderly. But I only know of one old-age home in Armenia. Who’s looking after the rest?

    Sept. 30 – Aznavour Wants Turks and Armenians to Reconcile Before He Dies

    In an interview with RTS (Radio Television of Serbia), Charles Aznavour is alleged to have said he hopes to see Armenians and Turks reconcile before he dies.

    Bonne chance, mon ami. 

    Source: HetqOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. Activists Launch Petition Calling Environmental Ministry to Account
    2. Decision 2013: Ruling party rep. calling for end to ‘political upheavals’ in Armenia
    3. Main opposition CHP to cease calling Erdoğan ‘Mr’ or ‘Prime Minister’
    4. Brand Train “Armenia” of Yerevan-Batumi-Yerevan Route Closes the Season
    5. Barev, Yerevan bloc to start reforms of Armenia’s government system from Yerevan

    China: President Takes Action Against High Ranking Corrupt Officials

    Image 55858.jpg

    21:31, July 30, 2014

    Zhou Yongkang, one of China’s most powerful former leaders, is under investigation in the highest-level corruption inquiry since the Communist Party came into power in 1949.

    Under current president Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign, the party’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection is investigating Zhou for “serious disciplinary violations,” as the officialXinhua news agency reports. Media has not yet, however, specified the allegations against him.

    The probe is an attempt to show the length to which Xi and the party will go in order to combat abuse of power reportsThe Wall Street Journal. 

    A commentary published in the officialPeoples Daily makes the point that regardless of  an official’s rank or supporters, punishment will result for violating laws or the party’s discipline. 

    In recent years an agreement has been in place  ensuring that for the sake of party unity,  most senior figures would not be investigated. Zhou’s case has been the first to break the agreement and is aimed at party purity instead. Communists are hoping to stay legitimate and to win more supporters. 

    The anti-corruption campaign has realized its vow of no off-limit targets, says political scientist Zhang Ming in The Guardian.

    reportingproject.net

    Source: HetqOriginial Article

    Related posts:

    1. China: Anti-Corruption Probe Targets Top Officials
    2. Over 182,000 officials punished in China graft crackdown
    3. China: Victims Claim Anti-Corruption Probe Employs Torture
    4. Civic Activists Demand Action Against ‘Corrupt’ Ex-Minister
    5. Jailed Former High Ranking Armenian Officials Deny Bribery Charges

    Armenian Gangs: Caught between an Archetype and a Cliché

    Image 55647.jpg

    19:15, July 12, 2014

    By Marineh Khachadour

    “The whole thing started with a scene straight out of a mobster movie. It was around 6 p.m. when more than a dozen men from two organized crime groups opened fire on each other in a North Hollywood parking lot. Witnesses say nearly everyone was armed, and the shootout quickly went mobile. The men took off in cars, exchanging fire as they weaved through the Whitsett Avenue traffic.”

    Stories such as this are not unique to Armenians in the American press, but this investigative report recently published in the LA Weekly is about Armenian Power, the Los Angeles based Armenian gang that operates in the heavily Armenian populated communities of Glendale, Burbank, and North Hollywood.

    The writer describes the members of the group as “gun-toting defendants” driving flashy cars “and connected to elaborate schemes in bank fraud, identity theft and other highly sophisticated white-collar crimes.”

    Armenian Power originated in the 1980s by young Armenians, mainly from Soviet Armenia, to protect themselves from Mexican gangs in Los Angeles high schools. In time the organization developed working relations with the latter and shifted focus from fighting for territory to fighting for money and power.

    My initial reaction to the report, like to all things Armenian, is visceral. Besides the fact that the horrific nature of the group’s actions turns my stomach, I feel angry. There are many positive contributions Armenians make to the communities they live in, so why point out the negative?

    I think and catch myself in doing something very typically Armenian: reacting defensively when a non-Armenian criticizes my people. I immediately want to blame someone, mainly the person who is pointing a finger in my direction. This is a natural reaction for those of us who take pride in belonging to a lineage older than Noah’s Ark.

    Ancient is the Armenian archetype – our intuitive behavior that has proven to withstand the test of time. We’ve been around so long, we consider ourselves to be wise and flawless. It is in our ethnic genome to revere the old and be doubtful of the new, to respect the elder as authority and dismiss the young as naive and inexperienced, to move in time and space, but not leave the past and the home we left behind. Any divergence from what has history and is the norm, we perceive as deficient, abnormal, lacking.

    Young Armenians in American public schools faced with anything but the norm, as they know it, are caught by surprise like objects uprooted by cyclonic winds.

    When life throws us into the realm of the unexpected or takes us out of our element, when it forces us to question our truths and face our shortcomings that make us seem not so perfect, we feel ashamed and become unforgiving. This quickly leads us on to the path of self-loathing. Our genesis, the very thing that is the source of our pride and the reason for our being, becomes our handicap in the youth-crazed, ever changing culture of the new world. We feel betrayed.

    Additionally, we have been conditioned to put on our best face in public, regardless of what is going on inside. This archetype was reinforced during the Soviet era. We do not air our dirty laundry in public, but proudly display our clean, shiny load in front of our balconies and windows literally and figuratively. We even pride ourselves in the way we pin the pieces next to each other on the clothesline!

    So, regardless of our circumstances, we find ways to put on a front like the well choreographed parades of the Soviet government. For God’s sake, we were the first people to adopt Christianity as our state religion! Never mind that our church is void of spirituality and our God cares more about the dead than the living.

    Then we boast, and when others dare to not appreciate our genius with expected enthusiasm, we resort to demeaning, deprecating commentary and are not shy about projecting our negative feelings. No one is good enough, smart enough, deserving enough as Armenians. We’re the oldest and the wisest, and therefore most deserving of respect and appreciation.

    More than once I have had to counsel a distraught Armenian parent complaining about how people make fun of their perfect child because he/she does not look or act like them.

    When our expectations are not met, we are wounded and insulted. This is when the daredevil gene kicks in, and we don’t hesitate to give our perceived enemy a piece of our mind, or show off a flexed muscle.

    We call this taseeb (honor): a sentiment that forces an Armenian to pick up a rifle and defend his physical and psychological turf. It is the same sentiment that drives a young Armenian to defend himself from insults and aggression, real or perceived, from a person of a different ethnicity in an American high school.

    These archetypes are some of the underlying factors that lead Armenian youth into conflicting situations outside their circles.

    In a new and changing world, old archetypes no longer serve the needs of the people, while the new ones are constantly elusive. Coupled with the desire to belong and to fit in, this drives people to adopt clichés that are readily available in a world congested with material, ideas and attitudes. Thus, to be accepted by the out-groups, to measure up and to be competitive, they quickly adopt what is more accessible to them for putting on the “perfect face.”

    Designer clothing and accessories, Mercedes, BMW, Porches, attitudes and gestures we don’t quite grasp but admire, just about anything that we perceive as distinguishing and defining the out-group we are so eager to be a part of and be appreciated by, we collect. Clichés are easy to launder, polish, and pin on one’s life’s “clothes line”. Life in the new world becomes a long string of clichés.

    In the absence of archetypes, reality is re-imagined, improvised like life on a theater stage, Marshall McLuhan explains. On this stage, young people are the characters of their own show, and there is nothing in the world more important than that until new archetypes take form.

    The mafia or its modern day version – gangs that are a common occurrence in societies constantly in flux – is the stage where young people play out their roles. There have been Irish,   Italian, Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Mexican gangs in America prior to the Armenians.

    Every wave of new arrivals, every wave of change, brings with it a new set of expectations and challenges. While families try to decipher the laws, rules, and traditions of their new environment, the young tend to gravitate towards groups that fill the need for belonging and provide a security network.

    Some, more than others, in every group are willing to break rules often to their own detriment while caught between archetypes of the old world and the clichés of the new.

    Marineh Khachadour is an educator, writer, researcher working in a public school in Pasadena, California.  She lived in Armenia from 1992-1998. During that time she provided educational services and resources for Armenian women and children including refugees and served as Gender in Development Expert with UNDP, Armenia from 1995-1998.

    Source: HetqOriginial Article

    No related posts.

    Want to Write for Hetq?

    Image 33145.jpg

    10:24, March 14, 2014

    I’m looking for freelancers who can broaden the scope of Hetq’s English edition

    Arts & Culture, Commentary, Politics, Civil Society, Interviews…

    Anything interesting happening in your local community you’d like to share?

    Write to me with your ideas and story suggestions.

    Hrant at hg.hetq@gmail.com

    Source: HetqOriginial Article

    No related posts.

    For Better or For Worse: Nature Protection Ministry Proposes Amendments to Water Use Laws

    Image 32562.jpg

    16:44, February 14, 2014

    With the goal of providing a systematic solution to issues of effective use of water resources in Ararat valley, the Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia (RA) is proposing amendments and additions to the RA Water Code, and the RA laws on the Republic of Armenia’s National Water Program, on Licensing, and on State Tax.

    The proposed legislative package has been sent to the relevant state agencies for their input.

    Head of the Ministry of Nature Protection’s Water Resources Management Agency Volodya Narimanyan told Hetq, said that with this amendment package his ministry is attempting to clarify the ideas and the ambiguous commentary, as well as introduce new requirements. For example, one of the main points of the proposed amendments is if water use permit conditions are not met, the water use permit might be annulled.

    “In the past, if water use conditions weren’t met, we couldn’t void the permit, but now we’re making that clear. If the state gives you a water use permit with this condition, be kind and meet this condition; otherwise, we will make the permit null and void,” he explained.

    A new requirement in the proposed package concerning the execution of drilling operations stipulates that a drilling company or individual must obtain a license so that the state can supervise its activities. “Those companies that execute drilling must have a license for drilling. That is, we are proposing to license activities,” he added.

    After the relevant state bodies discuss and submit their opinions regarding the amendments, Narimanyan says, the package will be sent to the RA Ministry of Justice, the government, then finally to parliament.

    Source: HetqOriginial Article

    No related posts.