Comments on: Constitutional Court of Armenia’s Decision Not Valuable from Legal Perspective: Alaverdyan http://hyemedia.com/2010/01/13/constitutional-court-of-armenias-decision-not-valuable-from-legal-perspective-alaverdyan/ ARMENIAN NEWS AGGREGATOR Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:20:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Papken Hartunian http://hyemedia.com/2010/01/13/constitutional-court-of-armenias-decision-not-valuable-from-legal-perspective-alaverdyan/comment-page-1/#comment-460 Papken Hartunian Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:18:29 +0000 http://hyemedia.com/?p=7040#comment-460 I think the "decision" (advisory opinion) of the Constitutional Court is unconstitutional. It advisory opinion does not follow from its own findings. It is written by one who does not have any idea about writing a legal argument based on the provisions of the constitution law. It even has failed to recite the provisions themselves either in the main text or as a footnote. It refers to "other documents." What document? A reader of "decision" must be able to read all sources used by the Court. While Mr. Alieve, an agent of Turkey is in the business of threatening the Republic of Armenia continuously, any bilateral agreement between Armenia and Turkey would be voidable under international law. I think the “decision” (advisory opinion) of the Constitutional Court is unconstitutional. It advisory opinion does not follow from its own findings. It is written by one who does not have any idea about writing a legal argument based on the provisions of the constitution law. It even has failed to recite the provisions themselves either in the main text or as a footnote. It refers to “other documents.” What document? A reader of “decision” must be able to read all sources used by the Court.

While Mr. Alieve, an agent of Turkey is in the business of threatening the Republic of Armenia continuously, any bilateral agreement between Armenia and Turkey would be voidable under international law.

]]>