Home » North America » Currently Reading:

US Secretary Clinton After Signing of The Armenian turkish Protocol

October 12, 2009 North America No Comments
US Secretary Clinton After Signing of The Armenian turkish Protocol

Plane Briefing en Route London, U.K.

Secretary of State
En route London
October 10, 2009 

SECRETARY CLINTON: This is on the record, yes. Well, we had a good night in Zurich, watching the signing of the protocols between Turkey and Armenia. And now the process continues. We, obviously, are committed to doing everything we can to build on the milestone that was reached today, but it’s challenging. And there is a lot of very difficult, complex issues that have to continually be discussed and worked out. But I am very pleased that we were able to get the protocols signed, and now we move on to the next phase of this.

QUESTION: What was in the protocol that they objected to? What did the Armenians object to in the statement that was to be delivered by the Turks?

SECRETARY CLINTON: There were questions of interpretation as to what should or should not be said. These are issues that Phil and I have been dealing with for months. And we were able to get everybody to understand that it was imperative that we go forward, and so we did.

QUESTION: Can you give us (inaudible)?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes, I know.

(Laughter.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Phil was at the hotel, and learned that there were some problems that had to be worked out. We went back. I was on the phone with Phil, with Minister Nalbandian, with Mr. Davutoglu.

And then we wanted to get everybody in the same place, instead of having the Swiss come to see us, and then talking to everybody on the phone. So that’s when I went in and spent time talking through some of the concerns that had been expressed, and brought Minister Nalbandian with us back to the university, so that the chief Swiss negotiator, (inaudible), plus our other counterparts, Ministers Lavrov, Kouchner, Solana, and –

PARTICIPANT: (Inaudible.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes, right, (inaudible), were all in the same place. We began to talk it through.

QUESTION: (Inaudible.)

QUESTION: Why not have any statements of –

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes.

QUESTION: Why not have the statements afterwards? Why was that decided?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first of all, it got awfully late. I was already two hours late. Lavrov was late. Everybody was late. The foreign minister from (inaudible) had already missed his plane. So it was sensible to get the signing done, and then people could issue their statements, which I am sure they’re doing. And we’re working on a joint statement among the witnesses.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) for an hour?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Because I was on the phone. And I was talking to Phil, I was talking to Nalbandian, and I was talking to Davutoglu, and we were — and talking to the Swiss. And so, we were trying to get everything worked out so we could move forward. And that’s when I — so when I left the car, I went to ask Minister Nalbandian to drive with me to the university, which he did.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) what is the most difficult diplomatic thing that you have done so far?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I mean, we do diplomatic –

ASSISTANT SECRETARY GORDON: Things?

SECRETARY CLINTON: — things, yes –

(Laughter.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: — of varying degrees of difficulty. Kind of like diving every day. Some of you were with me in Honduras. That was also a very challenging negotiation, which finally worked out very well.

But I think it’s just what you sign up for. I mean, this is — when you’re trying to help people resolve long-standing problems between themselves, it is a very challenging process. People have a lot of history that they have to contend with. They have all kinds of domestic, political challenges. The Armenians, as we saw with President Sargsian’s tour, have people around the world with strong feelings. So, it is — you know, it is a challenge, but that is what we’re trying to work out here.

QUESTION: Are there –
QUESTION: (Inaudible) the possibility of ratification (inaudible)?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, they’re both going to be submitting the protocols to their parliaments, and it’s going to be difficult. But that’s the next step of the process.

QUESTION: So what was it that got — what was it that allowed them to sign? What was the deal that was reached? (Inaudible.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: I think that — I think there was an agreement that the protocols should speak for themselves. I mean, they have been carefully, painstakingly negotiated over many months. And, at the end of the day, that was what the substance of this was about, what the protocol said.

People are free to say whatever else they want, but let the protocols be the statement. Because, in effect, that’s what we were there to sign.

QUESTION: Can I ask what is probably a completely obvious question? Why did it take three hours to get them to agree not to do something?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Phil and I have negotiated over press releases that have taken days. So, actually, this is pretty speedy, all things considered.

QUESTION: (Inaudible.)

QUESTION: I just want to — I mean, why — were they both insistent on giving (inaudible) statements?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I will let Phil pick that up.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY GORDON: When there are multiple parties involved — and the Secretary mentioned that we also have, you know, the Russians and Solana, and the French, and the Swiss — you know, you can’t just do this in one second. You have to talk to the different actors involved, and be careful, and make sure you get everything right. And three hours is actually not — I mean, the Secretary was joking, but a lot of these statements that you see released, when you see the final product, they take an awful lot of time of rolling up the sleeves and talking about issues.

QUESTION: Can you give us any kind of a flavor for what the sticking points were? Just a flavor of what the sticking points were?

ASSISTANT SECRETARY GORDON: No. I think, you know, you can talk to the parties. I don’t think we need to get into the details of diplomatic discussions. Look at the protocols, and you know what this is all about. And the protocols, as the Secretary says, speak for themselves.

QUESTION: Why is –

QUESTION: Was there a critical moment where you said to the principals, “Look, guys, this is too important. We can’t let this whole thing unravel?” Because — if there is such a moment, could you give us a flavor?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, there were several such moments, because we believe strongly that this is in the best interests of both Armenia and Turkey. We recognize how hard it is, and what courage it takes to move forward in the face of very strong opposition in both countries.

So, there were several times when I said to all of the parties involved that this is too important, that this has to be seen through. “You’ve come too far, all of the work that has gone into the protocols, you know, should not be walked away from. And will there be continuing difficulties in working this out? Of course there will be. But you have agreed on these protocols. So let’s sign those, and then we will go on to the next stage.” And eventually, everyone decided that would be –

QUESTION: Who did more of the talking in the car ride down to the university, you or the Armenian?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I did a lot of talking, didn’t I? Yes.

(Laughter.)

QUESTION: Was that a kind of a — was that a moment where you were able to bring your point across?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we just kept making our point.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY GORDON: She looks pretty good. She’s been on a plane all night, and –

QUESTION: Four minutes until the –

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, he had some really deep concerns, and wanted to make sure people understood them, which we — Phil and I — conveyed that we not only did understand, but we appreciated how hard this was, but that this needed to be done.

QUESTION: Did you have to call the President?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes. Yes. Several times.

QUESTION: From the car or the hotel?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Hotel and university.

QUESTION: (Inaudible.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Phil and I have been kidding about this, because –

QUESTION: You weren’t supposed to negotiate, right, you were just going to witness?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, but we know that this is always fraught with potential complexities. And so, we said, “Look, we think we’re going to go, and we will be able to witness this.” But we weren’t surprised at all.

QUESTION: The parties are

QUESTION: (Inaudible) said the dispute was over language that would say something about, “We will negotiate” — something about peace in the Caspian region, and that the Turks — the Armenians objected, because it was a reference to the occupied territory in Azerbaijan.

SECRETARY CLINTON: There were concerns from both sides. It’s really not accurate to characterize the questions as only coming from one side. There were concerns on both sides.

QUESTION: (Inaudible.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: We are going to leave with Phil, and –

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, one last thing. There was this major attack in Pakistan.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes.

QUESTION: Are you in a position to say anything? I know you have been very busy, but –

SECRETARY CLINTON: No. But, I mean, I’ve been briefed about it. I am not in a position to say anything about the specifics of it, other than to point out this shows the continuing threat to the Pakistani government, and the very important steps that the civilian leadership, along with the military, are taking to root out the extremists, and to prevent, you know, violence and direct assault on the sovereignty of the state.

Source: US Department of StateOriginal Article

Related News:

  1. US Secretary of State Reveals Why No Statements Followed Zurich Signing Ceremony
  2. Protocol Signing Postponed Upon Armenia Side’s Initiative
  3. Clinton to Attend Turkey-Armenia Normalization Deal Signing
  4. ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian Today Sent a Letter to secretary of State Hillary Clinton
  5. Russia Welcomes the Signing of The Protocol, While Azerbaijan Dissatisfied

Comment on this Article:







Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Apricot Stone: Eva Rivas in Eurovision 2010

-

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

The Protocol

Full Text of The Armenian Turkish Protocol

Recent Comments

  • Jean Jaques bagrationi: Typical ungrateful Georgians. Everything Georgians have today, was because of th...
  • Jean Jaques bagrationi: Look, religious freedom is fine and dandy, I for one, belong to an Armenian Pro...
  • Pyuzant: Jean Jagues Bagratyuni, God bless you,one more thing not only protect our mother...
  • john papazian: Every time the Turks say "prove it" I get to thinking,thousands of photographs,r...
  • john papazian: Why doesn't Armenia annex Karabakh?...
  • john papazian: First time here and looks good. Getting any real stance or conviction from Washi...
  • jean jaques bagrationi: Azerbaijan was created by the British to make the siphoning of the oil found the...
  • jean jaques bagrationi: If and when the border is opened, we should keep our eyes open, looking for infi...
  • jean jaques bagratyuni: Why on earth Armenian soldiers are denied body armor. This is traechery on the p...
  • Jean Jaques Bagratyuni: I wished Azerbaijan just shut up for a few days. When a force of 900 Armenian ir...

Tag Cloud

Poll

Should the Armenian Parliament ratify the Armenian-Turkish protocol?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Our Sponsors

Commentary

On The Principles Of Self-Determination And So-Called “Territorial Integrity” In Public International Law (The Case Of Nagorno-Karabakh)

June 22, 2010

On The Principles Of Self-Determination And So-Called “Territorial Integrity” In Public International Law (The Case Of Nagorno-Karabakh)

By: Ara Papian – Head, “Modus Vivendi” Center

We are not going to negotiate over the right of the people of Artsakh (Karabakh) to self-determination.

Serzh Sargsyan, President of the Republic of Armenia, 1 June 2010

 

It is for the people to determine the destiny of the territory and not the territory the destiny of the people.

Judge Hardy Dillard, International Court of Justice, 16 October 1975

 

Is ‘Reconciliation’ Compatible with Justice?

June 2, 2010

Is ‘Reconciliation’ Compatible with Justice?

By Lucine Kasbarian

On Wednesday May 12, at the Armenian Library and Museum of America (ALMA) in Watertown, Massachusetts, editors Emil Sanamyan of the Armenian Reporter and Khatchig Mouradian of theArmenian Weekly spoke about their recent trip to Turkey sponsored by TEPAV – a Turkish think tank that has recently been promoting Turkish-Armenian relations. TEPAV is funded by TOBB, the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey.

 ALMA Executive Director Mariam Stepanyan welcomed the audience after which moderator Marc Mamigonian, Academic Affairs Director of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR), opened by noting that there was no formal title for the evening’s program because the trip was not necessarily part of what would be termed “Turkish-Armenian reconciliation or relations.”

Davit of Sassoon is Undefeated or Once More on Foreign Language-Medium Schools in Armenia

June 2, 2010

Davit of Sassoon is Undefeated or Once More on Foreign Language-Medium Schools in Armenia

By Ara Papian – Head, “Modus Vivendi” Center

The changes proposed by the Government to the law on language has recently become subject to heated public debate. It is natural and good that society express many opinions. This implies that we are gradually surmounting the legacy of the not-too-distant past. It is unfortunate, however, that those in favour of the chan­ges to the law are not putting forth reasonable counter-arguments to the political, legal, economic, psychologi­cal and cultural facts presented by their opponents, but are instead simply warping the essence of the issue in attempting to present the case as a manifestation of xenophobia and advocacy for self-imposed isolationism.

An Investigative Report:The Woodrow Wilson Center Desecrates its Namesake’s Legacy and Violates its Congressional Mandate

May 20, 2010

An Investigative Report:The Woodrow Wilson Center Desecrates its Namesake’s Legacy and Violates its Congressional Mandate

By: David Boyajian

Is the Woodrow Wilson Center seeking to discredit the Treaty of Sèvres on its 90th anniversary by honoring Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu?

Woodrow Wilson, the 28th American president, is looking down in horror at what the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (WWC; WilsonCenter.org) is doing in his name.

Most Americans are not aware of the DC-based organization, or that their taxes comprise one-third of its multi-million dollar annual budget.

The WWC was created by Congress in 1968 through the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Act to commemorate the late president’s “ideals and concerns” and memorialize “his accomplishments.”

The WWC has in several ways, however, violated its Congressional mandate.

LATEST DIASPORA NEWS

USAID Provides $50 Million To Armenian For Economic Development and Social Reform

August 6, 2010

At an official ceremony held in the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Economy on August 6, 2010, Minister of Economy Nerses Yeritsyan, US Ambassador to Armenia Marie L. Yovanovitch and USAID/Armenia Mission Director Jatinder Cheema signed two Assistance Agreements under which the US Government will provide up to $50 million to the Government of Armenia for the period of 2010-2013 in support of the country’s economic development and health and social services reform, according to a release issued by US Embassy in Armenia .

Armenian Bread Price Set For Further Rise

August 6, 2010

The price of bread in Armenia looked set on Friday to soar further following the Russian government’s decision to ban all grain exports because of a severe drought that has devastated crops across Russia.

The move, announced by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Thursday, pushed international prices of wheat to the highest level since the 2007-08 global food crisis. They jumped by more than 12 percent in European commodity markets.

The wholesale and retail prices rose just as drastically in Armenia where one 50-kilogram sack of flour cost between 9,500 and 10,000 ($27.4) on Friday. The rise did not immediately push up bread prices. They are nonetheless expected to be adjusted accordingly in the coming days.

Armenian National Committtee of America (ANCA) Disbelieves Matthew Bryza Will Stand in The Way of Aliyev’s March To War

August 6, 2010

ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian commented on recent statement by political observer David Petrosian, who was cited as saying, “soonest appointment of a new U.S. ambassador to Armenia, – be it Matthew Bryza or someone else, is important in restraining Azerbaijan’s ambitions.”

Aram Hamparian responded as follows, “Just to be clear, this is the same Mr. Bryza who was the primary U.S. adviser to the Georgian government of Mikheil Saakashvili as he stumbled into war with Russia; the same diplomat with controversial ties to top Azerbaijani leaders (Foreign Minister Elmar Mammedyarov served as a groomsman in his Istanbul wedding to Caspian energy expert/advocate Zeyno Baran), the same nominee backed by senior Azerbaijanis close to the Aliyev regime and by leaders of the Azerbaijani American community, and; the same U.S. official who has, for more than a decade, turned a blind eye to Azerbaijani threats, military aggression, and acts of cultural desecration.

I Believe You Will: Mammadyarov and Davutoglu Discussed Karabakh Conflict

August 6, 2010

Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov hopes that his Turkish counterpart Ahmet Davutoglu will take very useful initiatives in the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, reports Azerbaijani news agency Trend.

“Turkey is highly respected in the international arena, and therefore I believe that Ahmet Davutoglu will take very useful initiatives in the Karabakh settlement”, Mammadyarov said at a joint press conference following a summit of Turkic-speaking countries.

The summit was held in Bodrum town in western Turkish province of Mugla on Thursday bringing together foreign ministers of Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.

US Secretary of State Extends Her Gratitude To The Cafesjian Center For The Arts in Armenia

August 6, 2010

The US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in a letter to the Director of Administration and the Acting Executive Director of the Cafesjian Center for the Arts Vahagn Marabyan thanked the Center for hosting her meeting with Armenian civil society leaders.

“The center is a magnificent landmark and a wonderful symbol of Armenian- American cooperation. Our tour of the Cafesjian sculpture garden and the Chihuly gallery was one of the highlights of my visit to Yerevan”, the letter of Secretary Clinton said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visited the Cafesjian Center for the Arts on July 5th, 2010. In her honor, a glass sculpture by Sidney Hutter was placed on exhibit – similar to the one by the same artist, added to the White House Craft Collection in 1993. The sculpture, known as the “White House Vase”, is now in the William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

Featured Books